Issues

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Sabians by Henry Corbin


I thank JimJam @ShiaChat for providing with some references to the Sabians. See here  

Henry Corbin stated in his book [1]
But of particular importance is the school of the 'Sabians of Harran', established in the neighbourhood of Edessa. The pseudo-Majriti contains much valuable information about their astral religion. They traced their spiritual line of descent back to Hermes and Agathodaimon, as al-Suhrawardi did later. Their doctrines bring together the ancient astral religion of the Chaldeans, studies in mathematics and astronomy, and neo-Pythagorean and neo-Platonic spirituality. From the eighth to the tenth centuries
they produced a number of very active translators, of whom the most famous was Thabit ibn Qurrah (ca. 826-901), a great adherent of the astral religion and an outstanding author of mathematical and astronomical works. [page 17]
And on page 125,
We saw above that the Sabians of Harran traced their descent back to Hermes and to Agathodaimon. Thabit'ibn Qurrah (d. 288/901), their most famous teacher, had written a book in Syriac on the 'Institutions of Hermes' and had himself translated it into Arabic. For the Manichaeans, Hermes was one of the five great prophets who preceded Mani. The person of Hermes passed from Manichaean prophetology into Islamic prophetology, in which he is identified with Idris and Enoch (Ukhnukh).
The Sunnis (according to the evidence of al-Shahrartani) condemned the hermeticism of the Sabians as a religion incompatible with Islam, because it can dispense with the prophet (the prophet-legislator of a shari'ah, that is): the ascent of the spirit to Heaven, into which Hermes initiated his disciples, made it unnecessary to believe in the descent of an Angel who reveals the divine text to the prophet. This flat incompatibility ceases to exist when the 2. like many 'strong personalities' of the time, the Iranian philosopher al-Sarakhsi (d. 286/899), a pupil of the philosopher al-Kindi (see below, V, 1), was a Shiite, or was thought to be one. He had written a book, now lost, on the religion of the Sabians. His teacher al-Kindi had also read what Hermes had to say to his son {no doubt an implicit reference to the Pimander) concerning the mystery of divine transcendence, and he stated that a Muslim philosopher like himself could not have put it better, Unfortunately, the Sabians did not possess a 'Book' brought to them by a prophet-legislator, a Book which might have won them official recognition as ahl al-kitab.
Little by little, they had to convert to Islam. Their last known leader, Hukaym ibn Isa ibn Marwan, died in 333/944. Their influence has nonetheless left ineradicable traces. Their conviction that syllogism was inadequate to distinguish the divine attributes is reminiscent of the reservations expressed by the Imam Ja'far with regard to dialectic (the science of the kalam). Something of their terminology, allied to that of Manichaeism, appears in the work of al-Shalmaghani (d. 322/934), the moving figure of a personal tragedy fitting for an ultra-Shiite. Something of it enters Sufism (al-Kharraz, d. 286/899; al-Hallaj, d. 309/922) through the intermediary of Dhu al-Nun al-Misri (d. 245/859), an Egyptian who was both alchemist and mystic. The neo-Platonists of Islam who effected the synthesis between philosophical speculation and mystical experience, such as al-Suhrawardi (d. 587/1191) and Ibn Sab'in (d. 669/1270), expressly claimed to be part of a chain of initiation (isnad) which goes back to Hermes. In the seventh/thirteenth century, Afdal al-Din al-Kashani, a Shiite Iranian philosopher, translated a hermetic treatise into Persian.

Reference
[1] Book: Henry Corbin, History of Islamic Philosophy, Institute of Ismaili Studies

Bahrain Interview

Bahrain Interview - Sayed Mahdi Al-Modarrasi & Zahra Al-Alawi








Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Malaysia Shia (Syiah) March Update

Prosecution of the thought crime continues in Malaysia......

As of March 27 2011, The Malaysian Shia (Syiah) community is told that their hearing that was supposed to occur on March 24th (delayed from March 22) is suspended (yet again!) to an undetermined date.
"just minutes before the supposed hearing, that it was cancelled after all, without any reason and without any definite date for a rescheduled hearing, other than a vague "before the end of May".
The site also contains a map of Malaysia showing where the Shia (Syiah) community is currently living. Going to court is not a simple process ….
"The conduct of the prosecutor is too inconsiderate for words to describe. Imagine the anxiety and cost involved, for people to have to hastily take time off work, prepare for their elderly parents' and young children's care in their absence, as well as for the journey to the sharia court far away. Some of them are too poor to own cars and have to book overnight bus tickets for the journey. See the map to get an idea of the distance they had to travel to respond to this last-minute announcement."
The Malaysian Shia (Syiah) community pleaded with the prosecutor and JAIS (Selangor Religious Authority/Department) to be more considerate of the hardships of the people that they are prosecuting currently.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

The Disputed Sabians


At the beginning of the Islamic period Harran was located in the land of the Mudar tribe (Diyar Mudar), the western part of northern Mesopotamia (Jazira). Along with ar-Ruha' (Şanlıurfa) and Ar-Raqqah. It was one of the main cities in the region. During the reign of the Umayyad caliph Marwan II Harran became the seat of the caliphal government of the Islamic empire stretching from Spain to Central Asia.

It was allegedly the Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun who, while passing through Harran on his way to a campaign against the Byzantine Empire, forced the Harranians to convert to one of the 'religions of the book', meaning Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. The pagan people of Harran identified themselves with the Sabians in order to fall under the protection of Islam. Aramaean and Assyrian Christians remained Christian. Sabians were mentioned in the Qur'an, but those were a group of Gnostic Mandaeans living in southern Mesopotamia. The relationship of the Harranian Sabians to the ones mentioned in the Qur'an is a matter of dispute.

Monday, March 28, 2011

The Sabians

The Sabians were followers of an ancient religion. The religion no longer exists in the world today. The Sabians used to worship the stars, planets and other heavenly bodies. 

In the Holy Quran, they are mentioned by name (of the sect) in verses 2:62, 5:69 and 22:17 (see the post on Mandaeism).

I have a number of questions about Sabians
1. Are Sabians monotheist or polytheists? 

2. What is the similarity between the Sabians and the followers of other religions from the past (i.e., Christianity and Judaism)? 

3. Do Sabians accept the Holy Prophet (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his pure family)?

4. Do Sabians accept past prophets (i.e., Abraham, Moses, Jesus and others)?

5. What rituals or practices that is unique to Sabians?

We don't have a lot of information about this religion due to a lack of historical data. The wikipedia states a number of opinions from Muslim scholars (from the past), i.e.,
  • They are described as Greek immigrants 
  • They could be monotheistic in faith and resemble the Christians
  • They could also be polytheistic
  • They are originally from Iraq

There is a general misunderstanding among the Muslim about the Sabians. Many Muslims are told that The Queen of Sheba (Bilqis) was a Sabian before she converted to Islam and married Prophet Sulayman son of David (may peace be upon them).

I think it is a misnomer to equate a religion, Sabians (صابئة‎) (The Holy Quran; 2:62, 5:69 and 22:17) with a tribe/race in Yemen, Sabeans (السبأيون‎), without proper historical data.

The Holy Quran contains a number of verses that document the religious belief of ancient people (of Iraq) who lived in the time of Prophet Ibrahim (may peace be upon him). These people worshiped celestial beings (heavenly bodies), i.e., stars, moon and the sun.

[The Holy Quran 6:76] So when the night over-shadowed him, he saw a star; said he: Is this my Lord? So when it set, he said: I do not love the setting ones. 

[The Holy Quran 6:77] Then when he saw the moon rising, he said: Is this my Lord? So when it set, he said: If my Lord had not guided me I should certainly be of the erring people.

[The Holy Quran 6:78] Then when he saw the sun rising, he said: Is this my Lord? Is this the greatest? So when it set, he said: O my people! surely I am clear of what you set up (with Allah). 

[The Holy Quran 6:79] Surely I have turned myself, being upright, wholly to Him Who originated the heavens and the earth, and I am not of the polytheists.

Who are the moon and stars worshipers?

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Looking for an article

I am looking for the following article

Madelung, “The Development of the Term Ghulāt in Muslim Literature with Special Reference to the Kaysāniyya”
If someone has the article, can you please let me look at it?

Friday, March 25, 2011

Dancing

Q and A taken from Sayyed Sistani website
http://www.najaf.org/all/index.php?l=ENG&c=q_a&keyword=&type=&to=QUE&page=17

1. Is it permissible to learn dancing?
It is not allowed at all, as a matter of obligatory precaution.

2. Is it permissible to organize dance parties where each husband dances only with his own wife to the sound of soothing musical tunes, wearing dresses that are not indecent?
It is not allowed.

3. Is it permissible for women to dance in front of other women or for men to dance in front of other men in a gender-wise segregated gathering with or without music?
Dancing of women in front of women or dancing of men in front of men is problematic, as a matter of obligatory precaution, one must refrain from it. The rules governing music have already been discussed earlier.

4. Is it permissible for a wife to dance for her husband with music or without music?
It is allowed as long as dancing is not accompanied with haram music.

5. Some schools in the West make it obligatory that their male and female students learn dancing. This dancing is neither accompanied by the common song, nor is it for entertainment; it is part of the educational curriculum. So, is it haram for the parents to allow their sons and daughters to attend such classes?
Yes, if it contravenes the religious upbringing. Rather it is, based on obligatory precaution, forbidden absolutely, if the student has reached the age of maturity — except if he has a valid reason for approving of it; for example, if he follows a mujtahid who allows it. In the latter case, nothing prevents him from allowing his child to take part in [such activity].

Abdullah Yusuf Ali

He translated verses of the Holy Quran from Arabic to English. His Quranic translation (The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation and Commentary) was one of the earliest. It was published in 1938. He was a very well respected scholar in his time and was credited to bring more English readership (to Islam's Holy Book) than anyone else [looking for source that can be quoted here].
 
I used to own two versions of the Quran translated by him. I had an original translation by him that was very detail. It was a huge book (over a thousand pages).
 
I also posses an abridged version printed in Saudi Arabia. It was heavily censored (footnotes, hadiths and explanations).

There is an interesting article on Al-Islam website about the changes that was made from the original translation done by Abdullah Yusuf Ali and the translation printed by the Saudis. You can see for yourself here 

A fact that is unknown by most people about the translator was that he was born from a Dawoodi Bohra (Ismaili Mustalian Tayyibi) parents. He was reported to have converted to the Sunni sect. No matter which sect he followed, he was among the very few who were honest enough to report the merits of Ahl al-Bayt in verses of the Holy Book.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Another strong speech about Bahrain

This speech is by Sayyed Hadi Moderassi. It has been translated from Arabic to English by Brother Fink on ShiaChat


Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Genocide in Bahrain!

Sectarian Cleansing in Bahrain: Stop the genocide, now! by Sayed Mahdi al-Modarresi 



Monday, March 21, 2011

Manichaeism

Manichaeism appeared after the teaching of Jesus (may peace be upon him) Son of Mary (may peace be upon her) and before the birth of the Holy Prophet (may the peace and blessings be upon him and his pure family). Founder of this religion/sect is Mani (a citizen of Babylon; Southern Iraq 215-277 AD).

Mani (a self-styled Prophet or Guru) professed the Religion of Light; a hybrid religion by combining elements from Christianity, Buddhism and Zoroastrianism.

Mani eventually fall out of favor with the Persian Kings and Zoroastrian Priests. He was tortured, decapitated and then hanged to rot (his head) on the city gate.

Mani's version of theology and cosmology sounds like something out of science fiction.

There is a kingdom of Light and Darkness. The darkness attacks light. Light is being defended by Primal man (not Adam; maybe not even human) and his five sons (light breeze, wind, light, water and fire). Behind the enemy lines are smoke, fire, darkness, fog and scorching wind. Primal man and his children were defeated by the darkness. A rescue mission by God of Light to save the Primal man left the soul behind. This brings to a new mission/task. Separating soul (or the light) out of darkness. The story doesn't end here. Read more here.  

The following statistics about Manichaeism may not be very accurate
  • Locations: Unsure (Mostly in Iraq)
  • Est. population: Extinct
  • Important literature: see on wikipedia 
  • Written/Spoken: Syriac and old Persian
  • Established (year):  Since 230-277 AD
  • Membership: Extremely secretive
  • Symbols: Unknown

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Bribing the people of the Middle East


Measures taken by some of the repressive Middle East government/regime to placate its people
Source: The Economist.

Mandaeism

Mandaeism is a very obscure religion/sect. Mandeans revere John The Baptist. The wikipedia also states that Mandeans revere other Prophets i.e., Adam, Abraham, Moses and Jesus [Need more evidence. I read a few articles that state the opposite to this]. 

We don't exactly know the origin of this sect. We are also not very sure if they are closer to the Jewish or the Christian faith. A number of people have claimed that Mandeans are Ahl al-Kitab (People of the Book) and they are mentioned together with its larger group (the Sabaens) in the following Quranic verses
[The Holy Quran 2:62] Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve.
[The Holy Quran 5:69] Those who believe (in the Qur'an), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Sabians and the Christians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness,- on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.
[The Holy Quran 22:17] Lo! those who believe (this revelation), and those who are Jews, and the Sabaeans and the Christians and the Magians and the idolaters - Lo! Allah will decide between them on the Day of Resurrection. Lo! Allah is Witness over all things.

Mandeans Statistics
  • Locations: Reside primarily in Iraq, Iran and now in the west
  • Est. population: less than 100,000(approx)
  • Important literature: Ginza Rba and Qolusta 
  • Written/Spoken: Arabic and Farsi
  • Established (year):  Unknown
  • Membership: Extremely secretive
  • Symbols: Unknown

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Qardawi the hypocrite

The hypocrite Qardawi made another statement about the protest in Bahrain
"In those countries, the whole population rose against oppressive regimes, while, in Bahrain, a sect, assisted by foreign sides, wanted to impose its will on the rest of the nation and this is where the problem lies," 
Reference
http://www.aawsat.com/details.asp?section=4&issueno=11799&article=613210&state=true
also reported in the financial times.


Behind all his fancy Islamic books (see wikipedia), this guy is a real snake.
See his statements about Egypt and Libya here.

And then see his statements about Bahrain (Shia) above and Iraq (Shia) here, and here

Friday, March 18, 2011

No Fly Zone?

They should have done this much earlier, but some countries in the world could not agree on the shape and form of the no-fly-zone. I think it is great that the world has finally agreed on some form of no-fly-zone.

Libyans are proud people. They wouldn't want someone to come and do the job for them. And they were very successful in the initial stage. Almost every major city (except some western part of Tripoli) was under them. The only reason Ghadafi could push back the people was because he had heavy artillery and aerial bombing capabilities.


Thursday, March 17, 2011

Decline of Hanifite, rise of Shafite and the birth of Zahiri

The decline of Hanifite School (Abu Hanifah) in Iraq is likely due to the rising influence from the Shafite school (Shafii) of Islamic thought.
 
Despite being anti-qiyas (Abu Hanifah approach), the Sunni Imam (as-Shafii) did make some concession in application of qiyas (analogy). Imam Shafii accepted Abu Hanifah qiyas only pertaining to orally or written transmitted sources (The Quran, Sunnah and sayings of the Prophet). 

The author also stated that antagonism against Abu Hanifah remained in the Shafite School for a long time despite themselves adopting the qiyas approach in their teaching. Author supported his view by providing statements from Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (a Shafiite) who was an outspoken critic of Abu Hanifah.

Soon enough, many of al-Shafii earlier followers turned back towards ra’y (these were known as ashab al-ra’y) i.e., Abu Thawr al-Kalbi al-Baghdadi, al-Husayn b. Ali al-Karabisi al-Baghdadi and Sirhab b. Yusuf Abu Tahir al-Tibrizi.

Another follower (Shafite), Abu al-Hasim al-Dariki rejected teaching of Abu Hanifah and Imam Shafii and would give out verdict contrary to his predecessors by relying only on hadiths.


But the most extreme Shafite (only hadiths, nothing but hadiths) was Abu Sulayman Dawud b. Ali b. Khalaf, the founder of Zahiri/Dawudi school.
 


The Sunni Imam as-Shafii

Chapter three [from book] is mostly about the Sunni Imam Shafii.

Imam Shafii is deemed as a reformer and a savior of traditionalists. One of his student testified that his teacher (Imam Shafii) ridiculed the arbitrary application of qiyas (analogy) by Abu Hanifah. Imam Shafii compared ra'y of Abu Hanifah to sorcery
"I best compare Abu Hanifah’s ra’y to a sorceress’ thread which, according to the direction in which it is pulled, appears either yellow or reddish." (footnote: book Ibn al-Mulaqqin)

As-Shafii is also credited for founding the Sunni Usul al-Fiqh. His most famous statement was (rephrase) ’If there was a contradiction between my sayings and the words of the Holy Prophet, then the saying of the Holy Prophet (saw) supersedes my statement’.

His prominent follower (also a theologian), Al-Nawawi contrasted his (Shafii) approach with the other theologians of his time
"He studied the legal attitudes of his predecessors and learned from the outstanding imams; he disputed with the most able and most profound men; he smoothed <nahata> their teachings, examined them, and from all material thus gathered together, he after wards produced a system which incorporated the Book, the sunnah, consensus, and analogy; yet he did not restrict himself to the one or the other among these sources as others have done." (footnote book Tahdhib al-asma from book)

Another Shafiite (Abu Bakr al-Jurri) praising as-Shafii
“In Abu Hanifah’s school, neither ra’y nor hadith is to be found; in Malik’s school, there is weak ra’y and sound hadith; Ishaq b. Rahwayhi has weak hadith and weak ra’y; in al-Shafii’s, there is sound ra’y and sound hadith.” (footnote book al-Sharani)

Imam Shafii gets glowing review from the Sunni Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal 
“We intended to refute the exponents of ra’y, but we did not succeed; then al-Shafii came and led us to victory” (footnote book Tahdhib al-asma from book)
continue reading part ten

Ways to identify a learned Faqih (Expert in the Islamic laws)

I found the following Q&A at Sayyed Sistani website (najaf.org). Mostly, these questions are about learned men who are able to distinguished the most knowledgeable scholar (a’lam). 

The jurists tell us that it is wajib to emulate the most learned (a'lam) mujtahid, and when we ask the religious scholars in our area, "Who is the a'lam?" we do not get a clear-cut answer so that we may follow his fatwa. When we ask them about their answer, they say that they are not ahlul khibra and they also say that: "we have asked ahlul khibra* and have been informed that identifying the a'lam mujtahid requires the study of the books of the mujtahids and that obviously is a time consuming and difficult task; so go and ask the others." If the problem of identifying the a'lam mujtahid is so difficult in religious circles, obviously the problem would be even more difficult in other countries like Europe and America. After a lot of difficulty when we convince the youths of these countries that it is necessary to abide by the shari'a laws, we reach to the question of who is the a'lam, and find ourselves lost for words. Is there a solution to this problem?


Answer
If there are some ahlul khibra who refuse to identify the a'lam for one reason or another, there are other ahlul khibra who readily identify him. It is possible to contact those ahlul khibra through the religious scholars and others who are reliable and have contacts with religious seminaries and with the scholars in other countries. So, although identifying the a'lam is not without difficulty, yet it is not a serious problem.

How do we know who ahlul khibra are so that we may ask them about the a'lam mujtahid? How do we reach them since we are far away from religious seminaries? Is there a way that can simplify for us the process of determining whom we should follow in taqlid?


Answer
The ahlul khibra are the mujtahids and those next in line in religious sciences, and they know quite well that one person in a limited group of mujtahids is the a'lam. And they have to consider the following three things to identify that a'lam: 

First: His knowledge concerning the methods for providing the authenticity of the hadith, and that involves 'ilmu 'r-rijal (the science of narrators of hadith) and 'ilmu 'l-hadith (the science of hadith). On this subject, issues like familiarity with the books [of hadith] and the ahadith that have been tampered with; knowledge of causes for fabrication [of ahadith]; variance in the manuscripts and distinguishing the most correct one; and being aware of confusion which sometimes occurs between the text of a hadith and the explanation of the compilers, are of utmost importance. 

Second: His ability to understand the meaning of the text by considering the general rules of speech, especially the style used by the Imams of Ahlul Bayt (a.s.) in describing the laws. The science of 'usûlu 'l-fiqh (Principles of Jurisprudence), Arabic grammar and literature, as well as familiarity with the views of the Sunni jurists who were contemporaries of the Imams play an important role in the understanding of the hadith texts. 

Third: Soundness of his view in deriving the rules from the sources. And the method of getting acquainted with those in whom the status of a'lam is confined to having scholarly discussions with them or to referring to their books or to the transcripts of their lectures on Jurisprudence and the Principles of Jurisprudence. If a person cannot know the ahlul khibra by himself, he can come to know them through the religious scholars and others whom he trusts. The geographical distance should not be a barrier to establishing communication with them in this era where many fast means of communication are easily available.


Sometimes the heart feels at ease in regard to a particular mujtahid. Is this feeling sufficient to do his taqlid if the ahlul khibra have difference of opinion in determining the a'lam?

Answer
If the ahlul khibra have difference of opinion in determining the a'lam, one must follow the view of those who are more qualified and capable among the ahlul khibra. This is the norm in dealing with all cases where the experts have difference of opinion.

If the ahlul khibra have difference of opinion in determining the a'lam mujtahid or just say that following any one from the given number of mujtahids is sufficient, can a person apply the fatwa of one mujtahid in one issue and another mujtahid in another until it becomes clear for him who is the a'lam?

Answer
This question has three parts: 
First: That some ahlul khibra announce that "it is sufficient to follow one specific mujtahid or of a group of mujtahids." This has no religious value at all. 

Second: That the ahlul khibra announce that two or more mujtahids are equal in knowledge and piety (in the sense of being careful in deriving the laws [from their sources]), then a lay person has the option of acting according to the views of any one of the mujtahids in all the issues. However, as a matter of precaution (ihtiyat) in some issues, if possible, one could act in such a manner as to fulfill the requirements of both views; for example, in the case of praying concessionary qasr and full (tamam) prayers. [That is, praying the same prayer in qasr as well as in tamam forms.] 

Third: That some ahlul khibra announce that mujtahid 'a' is the a'lam whereas others among the ahlul khibra announce that mujtahid 'b' is the a'lam. This can have two situations: A person knows that one of the two mujtahids is the a'lam but he does not know which one specifically. This is a very unusual situation and it has been discussed in detail in Minhaju 's-Saliheen, question No. 9. A person does not know which of the two is the a'lam in the sense that he thinks both are equal in knowledge. This refers back to the second of the three parts mentioned above, provided that the person is unable to identify the more Godfearing of the two mujtahids. If he is able to identify the more Godfearing of the two mujtahdis, he must follow the fatwa of that mujtahid.

If a person does not know the view of his marja', in a certain problem, is it necessary for him to find out about it even if it involves expensive telephone calls? Or is it sufficient to act on the known view of any other mujtahid until he finds out the view of his own marja'? And in such a case what will be the verdict on the past acts [done according to the view of the other mujtahid] if it differs from the view of his own marja'?

Answer
It is necessary for him to find out the view of his a'lam marja' even through telephone contact as long as it does not cause him harm [physically or financially]. If it is not possible for him to find out the view [of his own marja'], it is permissible for him to refer in that particular case to the other mujtahids, taking into account the hierarchy of the al-a'lam and the next a'lam in line. The deeds performed according to the view of the second mujtahid would be valid even if the worshipper later on finds out that it was not in accordance with the view of his own marja'.

http://www.najaf.org/all/index.php?l=ENG&c=q_a&to=QUE

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Situation in Bahrain


The situation in Bahrain is pretty bad. I saw some videos of protesters being violently attacked by the government security apparatus (mostly mercenaries) in the most brutal way. The images and videos are horrific (of people getting their head blown up; skull crushed open and losing body parts).

I am not hearing a lot of condemnation for this. Neither am I seeing anything been done to stop the onslaught against the armless civilians.

If this were happening in Palestine, the Muslim world would be out in the street in rage; burning flags and chanting death to whoever. But since the protesters are Shias, a great majority of Muslims in the world don't/won't give a damn.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Is Bahrain being occupied by Saudi Arabia?

Wait! Shouldn’t this be illegal or something?

Speculative theology

Abu Hanifah’s legal school was mocked because he (Abu Hanifah) preferred (was more in favor of) speculative theology than going through the traditionalist route (only dealing with the sources, nothing but the sources).
Speculative theology is innovations (Bid’ah). Bid’ah is not really a good word in the Islamic theology.
The next discussion was on terminologies.
1. Did ahl al-ra’y (people of opinions) created the word fiqh?
2. When did people stop using the word ilm al-hadith for Islamic Laws?
Few quotes were presented to show that Fiqh means proper religious laws derived from the Holy Book. Then another quote to show that fiqh is synonym with ilm al-hadith. [I am a bit skeptical on the explanation of the terminology ].
The author concluded by saying that the current meaning of the word fiqh (jurisprudence) was adopted only when battles between ahl al-hadith and ahl al-ra’y subsided.

Continue reading part nine

Clashes between People of Traditions (hadeeths) with People of Opinions (ra'y)

Next, the author presented a few of the frivolous cases brought forward by the people of ra'y (opinion) to stump their opponent (people of hadeeths). 

The people of opinions were motivated to show the usefulness of their approach (qiyas/analogical framework) by highlighting what they deem weakness of traditionalists (a huge dependency on traditions/hadeeths). Is the historical information from the life of the Holy Prophet (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his pure family) sufficient to legislate newer Islamic laws for different circumstances/life situation?

The ahl al-Hadeeth(people of hadeeths/traditions) had their own strategy to deal with such nonsense. 
  • Ibn Masruq would refuse to answer any hypothetical questions put forward to him until the case actually happened.
     
  • Ibn Masud urged people not to compare one thing with another, using the analogy. He said that one third of the knowledge is saying 'I don't know'.

  • Another member of ahl al hadeeth mockingly told his questioner that their job was to pass legal judgment and not satisfy the curious minded. And then proceed to tell the other guy to get lost.
  •  


    Sunday, March 13, 2011

    More hostility towards Abu Hanifa

    The author continued reveling the attitudes of the people after the establishment of Abu Hanifah's school. Most of the people were extremely hostile towards Abu Hanifah.

    Hammad b. Salamah (in the book al-Jahiz) narrated a story about a highway robber that would steal from pilgrims with the aid of cane. At the end of his story, Hammad said  
    “When accused of robbery, he would use the excuse that not he but the cane had acquired foreign property. If this man were still alive today, he would certainly be one of the followers of Abu Hanifah.”
    Hafs b. Ghiyath (in the book al-Jahiz) said
    “Abu Hanifah is the best-informed person about things that never existed; he is most ignorant about things which have really occurred.”

    Abu Hanifah was ridiculed for the simple fact that his legal school went against the general practice of the time. The scholars were mostly people of hadeeths (ahl al-Hadith) and not people of ra’y. Click here to see the difference between the two. 


    Continue reading part seven.

    Reference
    This book 

    Abu Hanifah with Imam Jaffar as-Sadiq

    In the beginning, the teaching of Abu Hanifah (that heavily utilized analogy/qiyas) was not well received by the traditionalist/conservative contemporaries of his time. The author quoted a short story about Abu Hanifah advising one his disciple on how to approach the people and propagate the new branch of jurisprudence
    Imam Abu Hanifah speaking to Zufar
    “You are little versed in the method of propaganda. Just go back to Basra, present to the people the teachings of their own imams and, at the same time, expose the weaknesses of the same. Tell them afterwards that there exists yet another teaching which consists of this and that, and which is based on such and such arguments. Now, if the new matter has rooted in their souls, tell them only then that this is Abu Hanifah’s teaching. After this they will be embarrassed to reject it”.[From this book]

    The author then presented a number of narrations from people who disagreed with Abu Hanifah. One of the narrations was a discussion between Abu Hanifah and Imam Jaffar Sadiq (may peace be upon him).
    The author of this book (Goldziher) has a very negative view (stereotypical) about Shias and the school of Ahlul Bayt. In a number of places he accused the Shias of having laws that are based on Persian idiosyncrasy.
    As for the meeting between Abu Hanifah with Imam as-Sadiq (may peace be upon him), the author tried to raise doubt about this event, despite quoting multiple sources and even admitting that the narration existed in an earlier source, at length and with great detail.
    Here is the conversation between the Sunni Imam Abu Hanifah with Imam Jaffar as-Sadiq (may peace be upon him). I am re-producing this hadeeth from a different sources [1][2][3] because this is clearer and without errors in the translation
     Abu-Na`im, in his book of Hilyat al-Awliya', has narrated that Ibn Shabramah and Abu-Hanifah, once, visited Ja`far ibn Muhammad who asked Ibn Abi-Layla, "Who is this one accompanying you?"

    "This is a man who enjoys discernment and skillfulness in the religious affairs," answered he.


    Al-Sadiq said, "Perhaps, this is the one who analogizes the affairs of the religion by his own opinions!"


    "Yes, he is," answered he.


    Al-Sadiq said, "Nu`man: Have you analogized your head, too?"


    "How can I analogize my head?" asked Abu-Hanifah.


    Al-Sadiq said, "I see that you can master nothing at all. Do you know what the word whose first part is infidelity and whose last part is faith is?"


    "You then tell me about that word whose first part is infidelity and whose last part is faith," replied Abu-Hanifah.


    Al-Sadiq said, "When a servant (of Almighty Allah) says, 'There is no god...' he will then declare infidelity; but when he continues, saying, 'but Allah', he will then declared faithfulness."


    Al-Sadiq then turned to Abu-Hanifah and said, "Listen, Nu`man! My father has reported to me from my grandfather that the Messenger of Allah said, 'The first to analogize (i.e. compare) in the affairs of the religion was Iblis (Satan) who said, 'He said: What hindered you so that you did not prostrate when I commanded you? He said: I am better than he: Thou hast created me of fire, while him Thou didst create of dust. 7:12' Hence, one who analogizes any of the affairs of the religion by his own opinion will be joined to Iblis on the Resurrection Day, since the latter has been more skilled in the field of analogy!'"


    Al-Sadiq then asked Abu-Hanifah, "Which one of these two sins are more serious; murder or commitment of adultery?"


    "It is murder," answered Abu-Hanifah.


    Al-Sadiq said, "However, Almighty Allah has accepted two witnesses only for murder but has not accepted less that four witnesses for the commitment of adultery!"


    Al-Sadiq then added, "Which one of these two is more important; the prayer or the fasting?"


    "It is the prayer," answered Abu-Hanifah.


    Al-Sadiq said, "Why is it then that a woman must settle the fasting that she misses due to menstruation while it is not obligatory upon her to settle the prayers that she misses due to the same?"


    Al-Sadiq then added, "Woe to you! How do you then depend upon analogy? Fear Allah and never compare the religious laws out of your own opinions."(3)


    1- Al-Borujerdiy: Jami` Ahadith al-Shi`ah; 1:184 as quoted from al-Kulayniy: al-Kafi.


    2- Ibn Hazm: al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam 8:513 S. 38.


    3- Abu-Na'im:Hilyat al-Awiliya' #: 196-197

    Saturday, March 12, 2011

    From Ra’y (opinion) to Qiyas (analogy)

    In the earlier stage of Islam, after the sad demise of the Holy Prophet (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his pure family), giving opinions (ra’y) was done on individual basis (without any direction or administration).

    Later on, ra’y (opinion) assume the form of Qiyas (analogy). Personal opinions (ra’y) must now apply a logical framework (qiyas).

    Two forms of qiyas emerged (I am summarizing and rephrasing)
    • Finding a material that is very similar to the problem at hand. Use this as a basis of comparison
    • Investigate the motive of the transmitted source and look for the spirit of law. See the cause and effect when new rulings are applied

    To what extent did the Sunni Imam Abu Hanifah applied the speculative component in his legal rulings?
    • The opponents of the Sunni Imam Abu Hanifa pointed out at his meager collection of hadeeths/traditions that were used by Abu Hanifah to establish his legal school.
    • His advocates refuted this by saying that their teacher (Abu Hanifah) only uses qiyas (analogy) when no traditions existed.

    Since there is some confusion here, the author said
    It would require a deeper insight into Abu Hanifah’s classrooms than is possible in view of the state of the sources, to decide for either one of these parties.
    So, what are the facts?

    Fact #1: Speculative Jurisprudence in some manner may have existed before Abu Hanifah.

    Hammad ibn Abi Sulayman (Abu Hanifah teacher), considered to be very weak in Prophetic traditions, was also claimed to be a great jurist in Kufa.

    Fact #2:
    The Sunni Imam Abu Hanifah was the first person to codify Islamic laws on the basis of Qiyas (analogical jurisprudence).

    The action of Abu Hanifah to codify his Islamic laws opened a pandora box.

    Insults were casually thrown against him.

    Ibn ‘Uyaynah said
    “There are two things which I did not expect to spread beyond the bridge in Kufa: Hamzah’s way of reciting the Koran, and Abu Hanifah’s jurisprudence; indeed, both spread all over the world”
    Note: please see footnotes in the book for original source.
    Continue reading part five

    Application of ra'y (opinion)

    The following is part 3. Part 1 and part 2.

    The author quotes an opinion from al-Shahrastani to rationalize using opinions in deriving the Islamic laws.  I am rephrasing al-Shahrastani; 'written text are limited but the daily life is unlimited and infinite'. The author then ask
    How could a codex, derived from entirely different conditions, have given answers to legal problems which arose under these new circumstances?
    Abu Dawud (al-Zahiri) would go with the weakest tradition if nothing better existed. The author hypothesized that many traditions might have been invented/fabricated to avoid ra’y (opinion).
    Sha'bi was against using opinions to derive Islamic laws and is quoted to have said   
    Ra'y (الرأي) is like a carcass ( الميتة); it is used as food in an extreme emergency only. [1]
    A few traditions were presented in support of ra'y (opinion). These traditions states that well known figure (i.e., Abu Bakr, Umar and others) have been known to use their opinions (ray) for giving out judgments, when they were unable to find the answers in either the book of Allah or Prophetic traditions. 
    Some of these traditions are disregarded (by scholars) because they were not authentic as per isnad (law of traditions) while others were using words and concept that were unfamiliar (non existence) in the time period of the Holy Prophet. These may have been a later invention.
    The author has also made a reference to a hadeeth in the book al-Adab (#79) by al-Bukhari. The application of al-ra'y (opinion) in theology has a negative connotation or derogatory/heretical. And this was agreed by al-Ghazali (whose stance was pretty much inline with al-Bukhari).

    Continue reading part four

    Reference
    [1] See the footnote in this book for primary reference

    Friday, March 11, 2011

    What is a Zahiri?

    The following are my notes from the book.
    • Theology: madhab al-Zahir or madhab Dawud
    • The follower of the school are called Zahiri or Dawudi 
    • School of thought: ahl al-Zahiri or al-Zahiriyah
    Muslim scholars (studying Islamic law) are broadly classified into 
    - ahl al-hadith (people of hadith) : Studying the transmitted source (hadeeth)
    - ahl al-ra’y (people of opinion/judgment/ rhetorical): Practical aspect of laws/legal deduction

    Madhab al-Fiqh (Sunni Orthodox schools): The determining factor in all these schools is the level of ra’y allowed or permitted. 

    The two extreme were the school of Sunni Imam Abu Hanifa and School of Dawud Al-Zahiri. Imam Abu Hanifah allowed considerable level of opinions (ra’y) in his school/madhab. Dawud al-Zahiri completely forbade using opinions to derive Islamic laws.

    Initially, the other Sunni Imams i.e., Malik b. Anas (madhab al-Maliki), al-Shafii (madhab al-Shafii) and Ahmad b. Hanbal (madhab al-Hanbali) took a middle position between the two extreme.
    After a while, it was no longer apparent (in the course of sects development) if these schools were aligned to the People of Hadeeths or the People of Opinions.

    Continue reading part three

    Read a book about the Zahiri Islamic law

    I finished reading the following book

    The Zahiris: Their Doctrine and Their History, a Contribution to the History of Islamic Theology by Ignaz Goldziher


    Overall I am highly impressed with the book. It is interesting to read (contains fascinating facts) and a great deal of hair-splitting theologians. I’ll definitely write more in my next posts.


    Brief bio about the author

    Goldziher was born in 1850 in the Hungarian town of Székesfehérvár into an established Jewish family. His upbringing was very traditional and conservative. He earned his PhD at Leipzig, Germany. His interest was mainly Judaism and Arabic Philosophy. Goldziher traveled widely in the middle-east region (Istanbul, Beirut,Damascus and Cairo). He was also the first non-Muslim to enrolled and studied at the al-Azhar University (Egypt). His work on Zahiri madhab/sect/school of thought is based on the following sources; Ibn Hazm’s Kitab al-Milal wa-Nihal and (Mulakhkha) Ibtal al-qiyas. The author died in 1921. This book was re-produced from his articles and monographs. 


    Continue with the notes from the book

    Illegal political naturalization by the government of Bahrain

    This is a must see video about the corrupt government of Bahrain, who brought in Muslims from outside to offset the Shia population. The video was made in 2002.

    Interviews with Arab immigrants

    Documentary produced by four opposition political societies in Bahrain about illegal political naturalization by the government. Consists of interviews with several Saudi Arabian citizens (from the Al-Dawaser tribe) who illegally received Bahraini nationality. Produced in June 2002. The government of Bahrain has been naturalizing tens of thousands of non-Bahrainis in the past few years to change the demographic make-up of the country, to prevent opposition groups from succeeding in parliamentary elections. In Arabic with English subtitles.

    Zahiri

    From Wiki: Ẓāhirī is a school of thought in Islamic jurisprudence and Aqida. The founder of this school was Dawud ibn Khalaf (d. 270/883), also known as Daud al-Zahiri because of his insistence on sticking to the manifest (zahir) or literal meaning of expressions in the Qur'an and the Sunnah; the school and its followers are called Zahiriyah. Ibn Hazm was a well-known practitioner and teacher of this school.

    The modern Salafi movement can be described as influenced by the Zahiri school.

    Thursday, March 10, 2011

    Islamic Sects (madhabs) and branches

    Check this out

    Who is W. Ivanow?

    W Ivanow (Vladimir Alexeyevich Ivanov) was a Russian Orientalist. His area of research and interest was Ismail-ism. He was a pioneer and has been credited with producing seminal books and articles.


    According to Farhad Daftary [1]
    In January 1931, the Aga Khan employed Ivanow on a permanent basis to research into the literature, history, and the teachings of the Ismailis. Henceforth, Ivanow rapidly found access to the private collections of Ismaili manuscripts held by the Nizari Ismailis of India, Afghanistan, Central Asia, Persia and elsewhere. At the same time, he established scholarly contacts with Asaf Ali Asghar Fyzee (1899-1981), the leading authority on Ismaili law, and a few other scholars of the Ismaili Bohra community of Bombay, who placed at his disposal their valuable family collections of Arabic Ismaili manuscripts dating to the Fatimid and Must‘ali Yamani phases of Ismaili history.
    It was in Bombay of the early 1930s that these scholars, led by Ivanow, brought about a breakthrough in Ismaili studies. Through the network of his Ismaili connections, Ivanow managed to identify a large number of Ismaili texts, which he described in an annotated catalogue (A Guide to Ismaili Literature, London, 1933). This catalogue was the first pointer to the hitherto unknown richness and diversity of the literary heritage of the Ismailis and remained an indispensable research tool for several decades, providing the material for the advancement of Ismaili scholarship.

    Some of his books and articles are
    Ismaili tradition concerning the rise of the Fatimids (1942)
    The Alleged Founder of Ismailism (1946)
    Nāṣir-i Khusraw and Ismailism (1948)
    Naṣīr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad Ṭūsī (translation)

    The Importance of studying Ismailis

    For a more detail biography, please see the article in the reference.

    Reference
    [1] Daftary, F., Vladmir Alekseevich Ivanow, Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, The Institute of Ismaili Studies